Two of the most popular games are Poker and Blackjack. In Poker, you play against other players rather than the casino, which gives you a.
Most of the blackjack players know that the online space is quiet lucrative for them as there are numerous casino bonus offered which enhance.
poker researches whether poker or blackjack offers a better chance to Most players don't win consistently, but if you study and play often.
poker player, blackjack is, and probably will remain, the world's most This means that in order for it to be profitable, the game must be.
poker player, blackjack is, and probably will remain, the world's most This means that in order for it to be profitable, the game must be.
poker player, blackjack is, and probably will remain, the world's most This means that in order for it to be profitable, the game must be.
Blackjack Or Poker More Profitable Game; Blackjack Or Poker More Profitable Games. Blackjack is a popular casino game, and it's often listed as one of the best.
Is poker or blackjack a better option for long term profits? When you count cards, the way you make a profit is by betting more when the shoe.
Blackjack Or Poker More Profitable Game; Blackjack Or Poker More Profitable Games. Blackjack is a popular casino game, and it's often listed as one of the best.
promo.sk-privet.ru βΊ sites βΊ johnnavin βΊ /10/10 βΊ why-i-switched.
Forums New posts Search forums. Automatic Monkey Banned Jun 28, The problem with live play is the speed. In general, without even blackjack online at the numbers, it makes sense.
I have poker friends who scout the tables much like a back counter, only they are looking for telltale signs of ploppy play.
Thunder Well-Known Member Jun 28, CasinoBlackjack Member Jun 28, Sucker said:. Not to mention blackjack or poker more profitable comps are much better as a bj player than as a poker player.
When you start a session, you have no blackjack or poker more profitable whether that first positive count will put you deep in the hole for the session, or catapult you into strong winning position.
In BJ even if the house figures me out the worst they can do is throw me out after the fact; unlike the poker pro they cannot legally change the rules or the conditions of play that would turn my game into a losing one.
Forums Forums General JavaScript is disabled. Online Poker is a totally different animal. You must log in or register to reply here.
Log in Register. If so, you'd need far more than 6K for 20 buyins. Members Current visitors New profile posts Search profile posts. Search titles only. But think about BJ. Playing poker with bigger blinds is extremely tough. Lets say that you play at a level where having 20 buy-ins is enough to have a comfortable RoR. I'd rather take my chances against a poker table with at least a few ploppies than cast my lot against the vagaries of how the cards may run in any given session. I do not like poker because I don't know what I'm coming up against at the table before it is too late. Once the BR gets to much larger levels, poker may start becoming a better option because of issues like heat. I have to assume any kind of AP is capable of doing anything I can do. New posts. It depends on the house rake which varies according to the stakes being played and the casino. Top pros can't "manufacture" hands. I was talking about live poker. The comparison is getting skewed here because we're using the wrong winrates for poker. Poker played among friends is mathematically a break even game over the long run. But the games were so soft, you could literally peddle the nuts and get paid off every time by clowns. Poker involves things like tilt and internet connection if you get dropped often, you play less and lose free hands of play , while BJ involves things like travel time, travel cost, and heat. So we've heard from the mathematical aspect the differences between poker and Now let's talk pragmatics. Some people might find it morally disturbing to take individuals' money instead of the casinos' money, however in the latter one, they are exactly doing the same, only indirectly So, there shouldn't be any moral issues as long as a person is fine with AP in blackjack.